I have a little lovely book

[~Mrs.ENGLI$H~]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة English Literature

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCklrNN80vI

wow


O M G



I had no idea


so Mr. English Literatur
you can say A few seconds

thank you all. May Allah Bless you all

[فضيل]

Nice and funny story

[P e a c e]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة انقلش

I am sorry to make
we will talk later on>>>



I do not know it does not sound right to me! no need to use on ! only later

actually later on is correct. But I don't know what is the difference between later and later on
some say: there is no difference and on here is just an intensifier
and some say that later on suggests that something will happen in the not too distant future, but with later there is no time limit.

[الطالب الموهوب]

It is good idea for us (English students).

[English Literature]

First of all I want to thank every body her >> I am happy >> to correct my mistakes

I will promise not to repeat it again


Pleas correct my mistakes( grammar & spilling ) any time really I want to learn

(1)

I think it will become difficult in the context and pronunciation!!

!! Still in the context of the sentence

better to say[COLOR="rgb(65, 105, 225)"] the letter--writer's house . he owns the house not the house owns the writer

I did not find this sentence>

.Nasreddin was already in bed .It was late , he said what do you want?



when you narrate in English they usually , they usually Quote the speech of the character then they refer to the him or her like following:

what do you want '', he said ''



I want you to write a letter to my wife ,said Ail .Nasreddin was not pleased.


He thought for a few seconds and then said, has the letter got to go far ?

seconds are plural we can not use the singular A here

its Come with( a few
Not related to the singular or plural

also do not forget the


quotation marks

Question mark located

what dose that matter ? answered Ali.

Question mark located


again ,,,quotations

Well, my writing is so strange that only I can read it , and if I have to travel a long way to read your letter to your wife , it will cost you a lot of money .

quotation marks again

! There is no formula question


God bless you

[English Literature]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة رضوان

actually later on is correct. But I don't know what is the difference between later and later on
some say: there is no difference and on here is just an intensifier
and some say that later on suggests that something will happen in the not too distant future, but with later there is no time limit.

Exactly my brother

[~Mrs.ENGLI$H~]

Question mark located
! There is no formula question


Not QUESTION bro

It is

Quotation marks


علامات التنصيص وليس الاستفهام اخي

I think it will become difficult in the context and pronunciation!!

It is better to say He is hungry instead of saying he did not eat or drink.... you get my point bro

we are here to learn new things and to be honest with you, I looked up for it in the dictionary , because I did not know it before

so now , I learned 3 new words + the A few seconds grammatical rule

and few more things

we should not keep on using the simple ways only . we should move on to the next level till we become experts in our major . Our lovely ENGLISH LANGUAG


Best regards

[~Mrs.ENGLI$H~]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة رضوان

actually later on is correct. But I don't know what is the difference between later and later on
some say: there is no difference and on here is just an intensifier
and some say that later on suggests that something will happen in the not too distant future, but with later there is no time limit.

I do not Know about the rule GRAMMATICALLY

BUT

When I watch a movie or anything in ENGLISH DIALOGUE

I hear them saying

LATER ON

if they are telling the others a Sequence of events

like: He went to the company early morning etc....later on he had dinner with the family. It comes between the events.

but for telling the others that I will meet them later they usually say: see you later or catch you later

I depended on what I hear mostly

[English Literature]

Second story

(2)
An old man died and lift his son a lot of money . but the son was foolish young man , and he quickly spent all the money ,so that soon he had nothing left. Of course ,when that happened ,all his friends left him . when he was quite poor and alone ,he went to see nasreddin , who was a kind , clever old man and often helped people when the had troubles .
My money has finished and my friends have gone , said the young man . what will happen to me now?
Don’t worry , young man Answered nasreddin . every thing will soon be all right again .whit , and you will soon feel much happier.

The young man was very glad .am I going to get rich again than ? he asked nasreddin.
No , I didn’t mean that , said the old man . I meant that you would soon get used to being poor and to having no friend .

How did the young man get his money ?
What did he ask nasreddin?
What kind of man was he?

()

[P e a c e]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة انقلش

I do not Know about the rule GRAMMATICALLY

BUT

When I watch a movie or anything in ENGLISH DIALOGUE

I hear them saying

LATER ON

if they are telling the others a Sequence of events

like: He went to the company early morning etc....later on he had dinner with the family. It comes between the events.

but for telling the others that I will meet them later they usually say: see you later or catch you later

I depended on what I hear mostly

So, your opinion is that later on = after that

yes, it's one of its usages
and there are more

I took this example form the dictionary:
I can't eat all of this - I'll finish it later on

the best answer I've found for this, is that later can always replace later on, and the safest way is to use later instead of later on

you can say: see you later on
and you can say: see you later - more common

I think it's like will and going to. will can always replace going to, and using will is safer