[ اللغة الانجليزية ] : ~||Last semester of Senior Year ||~

[M.A.S]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة **ألم و أمل**

الله يرزقج الجنه و ينويلج الخير وين ما كنتي و يحقق لج إللي في بالج يااااااااااااااارب اللهم آمين يارب أسعد M.A.s بدنياها و أبعد عنها كل شر ........ يارب أقبل كل دعوه تدعيها عاجل غير آجل و حقق طموحاتها يارب معدلها يصير أعلى و أعلى و يرتفع و يصير 4,50 و فوق يارب تكون من رتبة الشرف الأولى أو الثانية و تسعد أهلها و ينور طريقها و يزوجها الزوج الصالح و يبعد عنهم الشر آمييييييييييييييييييين :love 080:




.
.
.

يختي رحاب سمعتها عنها كل مب زين شيين شيين
و أسئلتها حيييل صعبه ,,, عندها م تشمين ريحة a,a+.b
و كل ما قلت لصديقاتي خذيت عندها يقولون لي يممممممممممممممه الله يعينك عليها ترى د_هدى أطلق منها
وما تخطط للبنات أسئلة الإختبار
يختي و الله تحطمت أحس مابي أكمل ليش كذا يقولون
و الأسبوع إلي راح ما حظرت المحاضرة من الخوف مابي أشوفها و الحمدلله ما عطت شيء أصلا
قولي لي عنها أسلوبها ؟ معامتها ؟ طريقة المشاركة عندها ؟ تخلي الواحد يقرى قطعه و لا شلون مثل هدى ؟ أسئلتها صعبه ؟ كم ممكن أقدر آخذ عندها ؟
سمعت إنها تسب في البنت و تهزءها و ترسب حرام كذا
وش السواااة إلحين

يسعدك ربي على هالدعوات الحلوه :"")
ولك مثلها واكثر ياااارب

شوفي هي شخصياً ما درستني، لأنها تدرس مواد عامه فقط ما تدرس تخصص.
بس صديقاتي مجربينها وبالعكس اسمع عنها كلام حلووو !
ولا تخافين ولا تسمعين كلام البنات اذا انتي مجتهده ربي ما يضيع تعبك
بس ولا يهمك بسأل صديقاتي وارد لك خبر

[**ألم و أمل**]

دريدي داي :love 080: ..... لحد بيتك يا عمري كلامك عطاني امل بس أنا مره م سمعت كلام البنات عند دكتورة و هم قالو ترى ترسب و كذا و خذيت عندها مسويه فيها دفره و حملت الماده عندها
الله يعطيج العافيه يارب
ياااااااااارب يااااااااااااااارب أقبل كل دعوه تدعيها عاجل غير آجل
و حقق طموحاتها ياااااااااااااااااااارب
حقق إلي في بالها ياااااااااااااااااااااارب
يااااااااااارب معدلها يصير 4,50 و فوق يارب مع رتبة الشرف الأولى
ويارب تسعد أهلها ووالدينها ويكونو راضيين عنها

M.A.S

يا لبباااك إنتي حسبتك تعرفينها
يا ليت يا عمري تسألينهم قبل المحاضرة ... هي علي يوم الثلاثاء من 12 ل 2
ممكن لا سألتي صديقاتك تخبرني بالرد برسالة خاصة
الله ينويلج الخير وين ما كنتي

سلميلي على صديقاتك

[M.A.S]

^
شيكي على الرسايل

[ارنوبه]

اللي حضرت مقال .. ياريت تخبرنا ايش اخذوا واش اسم الدكتور
وشلون اسلوووووووبه

[ارنوبه]

بنات انتو جداااا رائعات والله مافي منكووووو
ربي يوفقكو ويحقق لكم اللي تبون
ويهديكم لما يحب ويرضى
واقولكم
go ahead

[M.A.S]

بنات ممكن تساعدوني بليز؟
عندي اختبار نقد معتذرات ..
اللي عندها شي جاهز من مذاكرتها عن النقاد والنقاد اللي عارضوهم
تعطيني اياه ؟
ما لقيت شي انحاس مخي

[um_amanah]

Hello ,

I Uploaded documents f or you

*عجينة النقد = Read it before you study the hadouts it will orgnaize your information about the course

you also have a documents of New Criticsim school and

the opposition of New Criticism School

Arnold ,oscar and TS eliot.docx this document will help you to find what other critics said about Arnold

I took these summaries from students I hope that will help
you

Leavis

books
1-revaluation
2-the great tradition
3-new bearings in english poetry
4-the common pursuit

2- influenced by mathew arnold & t.s.eliot

3- leavis is a kind
of 'practical critic'
the critic is concerned with the work in front of him as something that should contain within itself the reason why it is so and not otherwise

4- main themes:

A- his literary criticism is evaluative

b- 'interstes of life' : Identifed as the genuine moral preoccupation of the creative writer and critic

c- reality and sincerity

d- impersonality and values

عيوب ليبز Defects

concernedLeavis’s views on university education.

He was accused of being both elitist and anti-democratic

Orrather, he did not overtly have one. Roland Barthes would have criticized himfor not declaring his ideology: his value system. Therefore, it is hard todetermine whether he had any consistency in his criticisms.

T.S Eliot demerits عيوبه ت س إليوت

1.glaring ones. Sometimes he is pontifical, assumes a hanging-judge attitude, and instead of sympathetic understanding, his pronouncements savour of a verdict. Often his criticism is marred by Personal and Religious prejudices, and dislike of the man comes in the way of an honest and impartial estimate. In this respect he does not live up to his own theory of the objectivity and impersonality of poetry. His condemnation of Milton, and that of Shelley, can hardly be called sound literary criticism
2.When he scoffs at Arnold for his being an over-worked inspector of schools, he drifts away from criticism proper and stoops to personal invective.
3.Moreover, he does not judge all by the same standards of criticism. For example, in his essay on Dante he remarks that knowledge of the ideas and beliefs of a poet is not essential for an appreciation of his poetry
But he condemns Shelley of his “repellant ideas.”
4.There is an element of didacticism in his later essays and with the passing of time his critical faculties were more and more exercised on social problems

ملخص من عند البنات عن ريتشارد
هآ ’
- أول شي انه كآن مهتم بالـ qualified reader يعني بمعنى آخر " النقآد " ,
- كآن يتبع الـ formalistic approach و الـ psychological approach ,
- شرحت لنآ الفور ميننيق بإختصآر وقالت مسؤليتكم انكم تشرحون وتفهمونهآ ,
بعدين شرحت الـ doctrine of poetry , و ركزت على :
two ways of assumptions :
1- intellectually
2- emotionally
وبمعنى ثاني :
1- intellectual belief .
2- emotional belief .
و ركزت بعد على أهتمام ريتشآرد في الـ sincerity .

Critics veiw about Richarad I ماذا أخذ الكتاب من عند ريتشار وماهو الذي انتقدوه
Later critics who refined their formalist approach to New Criticism by actively rejecting his psychological emphasis included, besides Brooks and Tate, John Crowe Ransom, W.K. Wimsatt, R.P. Blackmur, and Murray Krieger. R.S. Crane of the Chicago school was also both indebted to Richards' theory and critical of its psychological assumptions. They all admitted the value of his seminal ideas but sought to salvage what they considered his most useful assumptions from the theoretical excesses they felt he brought to bear in his criticism. Like his student Empson, Richards proved a difficult model for the New Critics, but his model of close reading provided the basis for their interpretive methodology.
I wanted to put a document about
F. R. Leavis as a leader of’Cultural’ criticism but it does not work so I copy it here
F. R.Leavis is also studied as a leader of’Cultural’ criticism advocated and practised by such authentic and respectable critics as MatthewThe basic contention of the critics of this persuasion, according to Prof. Naresh Chandra, is that literature is the best medium for preserving and the best vehicle for thetransmission of culture from generation to generation, this forming an perpetuating a tradition in culture.The function of criticism, therefore, to so interpret literature that the cultural values embalmed in it may not only become evident, but also attractive to the mind of man. This function of criticism has become all the more important in our time when cultural values are in the danger of being denigrated by hostile forces like industrialism, political factionalism and fanaticism, political and capitalistic exploitation, scientific and technological materialism, threat of war, and general deterioration in human relations. Naresh Chandra, NewCriticism

. F. R. Leavis’s English Literature and the University puts forward a strong case for the place of English literature in University studies, mainly on the ground that no other subject presents cultural values in a more forceful, persuasive and beautiful manner
The major shortcomings of Cultural criticism are its breeziness; the concern of the critics of this school is much more with the culture as embedded in Anglo-Saxon tradition. The critic is committed to a certain concept of culture and has no values of his own, and thus this type of criticism reduces the universal to the condition of accidents. Poetry and literature are concerned with universal and abiding entities, but culture cannot claim any such attributes. It cannot be accepted as pure literary criticism as it has a tilt towards propaganda.

R. Leavis and the Valuation School of Criticism=correction of opinion=of the opinion that tHEe ‘science’ of literary criticism is ‘valuation by some standard, of the worth of literature’ (The Nature of Criticism). =Ernest Boyd’s book Literary Blasphemies, which aims at revisiting downward the traditional estimates of a number of authors from Shakespeare to Hardy. The major writer of evaluative criticism is Yvor Winters.

أهم شي أنو يكون عندك :
1 / الكآتب والى أي مدرسة ينتمي وأسلوبه بالكتآبه و هيك ,
2 / النقآط الاسآسيه بالتكست و شرحهآ ,
3 / رأي بعض النقآد عن بعض نظريآآت الكآتب اللي كتبهآ بالتكست ’
4 / خذي لك كم نظريه قالهآ وأعرفي شي بسيط عنهآ عشآن تكتبينهآ بالاجآبه لو أحتجتي ’

Good luck this what I have

[عسولة الشرقية]

بنات الي برزنتيشن نقد مع نجلا يوم السبت


عن انواع الفورماليزم



قالتلكم ملاحظات ولا شي منا مناك؟؟


وشلون كان تقسيمكم للعناوين (ايش التوبيكات الي تطرقتولها وشرحتوها)


واذا بعد وحده مو من الي سوو العرض بس تذكر اشياء بليز لا تبخل علينا



موفقين

[um_amanah]

4 rules to write criticism

Disinterestednessmeans that the criticshould not be interested in any party ( whether political economical religeous ..etc ) he should be neutral and not take sides so he would have the freedom ofmind because if he was interested in a certain party then he would be servingtheir agendas and trying to meet their goals instead of trying to reform thesociety and promote values

Remember that Arnold himself is a moralist and was trying topromote morals and calling for reformation.

Detachementmeans that the critic shouldkeep away from the society and its problems, at that time most people werepractical ( materialistic ) interested in making money only. Arnold believesthat in order to find the solution for that problem you need to not be part ofit _detach yourself from it _. so the critic should detach himself from thepracticality which is the biggest problem in England at that time

independencemeans to be independent frompracticality and its aims , i.e you should not be thinking about the practicalconsequences of what you do

EnthusiasmI think ( not sure ) that ithas something to do with knowledge and that a person should be enthusiastic togain knowledge _ IDK _

Practical Criticism
The Four Kinds of MeaningRichards shows an interest in the effect of poems on the reader. He tends to locate poem in reders response. The being of the poem see ms to exist only in the readers. Poetry is a form of words that organizes our attitudes. Poetry is composed of pseudo statements, therefore it is effective. He talks about the close analysis of a text. Like a new critics, he values irony. He praises the irony and says that it is characteristics of poetry of higher order. In “The Forth Kinds of Meaning”, he talks about functions of language. Basically he points out four types of functions or meaning that the language has to perform.
Sense
What speaker or author speaks is sense. The thing that the writer literally conveys is sense. Here, the speaker speaks to arouse the readers thought. The language is very straightforward which is descriptive. This language is not poetic. Words are used to direct the hearer's attraction up on some state of affairs or to excite them. Sense is whatness of language use.

Feeling
Feeling is writer’s emotional attitude towards the subject. It means writer’s attachment or detachment to the subject is feeling. It is an expression. The speaker or writer uses language to express his views. This very language is emotive, poetic and literary also. Here only, rhyme and meter cannot make poetry to be a good, emotion is equally important. Especially in lyric poem, emotion plays vital role.

Tone
Tone refers to attitude of speaker towards his listener. There is a kind of relation between speaker and listener. Since speaker is aware of his relationship with language and with the listener, he changes the level of words as the level of audience changes. It means tone varies from listener to listener.
Intention
Intention is the purpose of speaker. Speaker has certain aim to speak either it is consciously or unctuously. Listener has to understand the speaker's purpose to understand his meaning. If the audience can't understand his purpose the speaker becomes unsuccessful. The intention of author can be found in dramatic and semi- dramatic literature.
There four types of meaning in totality constitute the total meaning of any text. Therefore all utterances can be looked at from four points of view, revealing four kinds of meaning are not easily separated. But they are in dispensable terms for explaining. Basically, the four meaning are interconnected in poetry.

i) Intellectual belief
ii) Emotional belief

*: http://www.ckfu.org/vb/t211165-411.html#ixzz1hc4D3Rbx

,

بعدين شرحت الـ Doctrine of poetry , و ركزت على :

Doctrine in Poetry
Here Richarads talks about the proper way of analyzing the text and what critic and reader should be like. He tends to locate the poem in readers response to it. It means readers analyze the text and respond any poetry from similar judgmental aspects. It shows every reader produces same meaning from same text as the text is organic whole obstacles and barriers the variation of meaning occurs.
His ideas are oriented toward distinguishing the belief of readers from that of the poets. If there occurs contradiction between the belief of readers and the belief of poets, the readers do not get sole meaning from the text. Because of readers’ temperament and personal experience, they don't get same meaning from the text The obstacle that brings variation in meaning is doctrinal belief of readers.

Richards finds two kinds of belief and disbelief

two ways of assumptions :

1- Intellectually

2- Emotionally

In an intellectual belief we weigh an idea based on doctrinal preoccupation, where as an emotional belief is related to the state of mind. He thinks that the good kind of being comes from the blending of the both. Until and unless we are free from beliefs and disbeliefs there comes variation in meaning. But to free our mind from all impurities is not possible. Therefore the reader should be sincere to get single meaning escaping from such obstacles. This sincerity is the way to success. The sincere reader has perfect and genuine mind. To be genuine mind, one should be free from impurities. In this sense the reader should be free from obstruction these obstacles is not possible

وبمعنى ثاني :

1- intellectual belief .

2- emotional belief .

و ركزت بعد على أهتمام ريتشآرد في الـ sincerity .

و بسسس هذي زبدة محآضرة ريتشآرد , ,

ليفيس

شوفي leavis أحسه أسهل كآتب أخذنآه و التكست حقه كآن ينقد الشآعر keats وكآن سهل مره والكلام كله يشبه بعض اعااده وبصيغ غير ,

leavis مآكآن يتبع أي مدرسه ولآ أي منهج بالكتآبه و كتب عن أكثر من نآقد وكآن ينقدهم

he did not write about criticism but he wrote a criticism

و كآن يؤمن ان الادب هو انعكآس للمجتمع وللحيآه الحقيقيه ’ كآن يرفض ان يفصل الفن عن الحياه , وان الفن لازم يحمل رساله اخلاقيه للمجتمع , عشآن كذآ كآن يهآجم الفكتوريان بويتري لانه كان بعييد عن الحياه الحقيقيه وانه كان خيااالي ,

زبدة الـ الكلتشرال أبروتش انه يعكس الحيآه الحقيقه في الادب والفن ,

وكان مهتم بـ close reading of the text ,,

هذي زبدة المحآضره مع د. نجججلآء

what I pasted was typed by Angelika and lost3

Good luck

[نــونــه]

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة dready days

بنات انا خططت و بديت فالتنفيذ........قررت اشتغل يوميا ساعتين ع مادة الترجمة زيادة ع الي تطلبو الدكتورة و شريت قران و كتاب احاديث و بديت اقرأ فيها واشوف الستركتشر و اختيار الكلمات و بديت احفظ مصطلحات دينية............تتوقعون بيجيب نتيجة شغلي ذا؟؟ والا بتعب نفسي ع الفاضي؟؟ ترا اخاف اكرف عمري وفالاخير انصدم بدرجة زي الزفت.........حقدت ع هالدكتورة من السيمستر الاول كئيبه صرت اكره كلاس الترجمة بس لازم استعيد ثقتي بالله اولا ثم في نفسي واكرف كرف الحمير"وانا والقارئات بكرامة" هشان اجيب نتيجة كذا تبرد القلب السميستر ذا تحدي يا انا يا هم لكن بأذن واحد احد انا اللي بيربح الجولة ههههههههههههههههههههههه ,,ياحلوات خلونا من الحين نشتغل ع انفسنا ونتعاون مانبغا زي السيمستر الاول نعيش لحظات الرعب في الايام الاخيرة و تونا نصحصح.......من الان دعونا نكون يدا بيد كي نقف في وجه العدو كصفوف ثابت بنيانها.................اتمنى كلامي لكم ماضاع سدى و ما احديعزز لي ههههههههههه والا ع الاقل يستجيب لي لان الفائدة بتعم علينا جميعا

فكررره. حلوة مررررره، الله يوفقك يارب ، أنا عندي اوراق بنات العام حقت الترجمه فيها ترجمه لكم سوورة منن سور القران مرره حلووووه

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة تولآيّ

" تاريخ لغه "

مرحبا بنات

احد فيكم لقى كتاب تاريخ اللغه حق الكومي

قال بينزله في الكوبي سنتر

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة dready days

فيه وحده نزلت قطعتين تلقينهم بصفحه11 من الموضوع دا

دريدي القطع تبع د.هدى مو سلوى

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة ارنوبه

اللي حضرت مقال .. ياريت تخبرنا ايش اخذوا واش اسم الدكتور
وشلون اسلوووووووبه

اسمه د. احمد حسن
درسنا الترم الاول ترجمة كان مررررره كؤوويسس
في المقال الترم ذا عطاانا نكتب برقراف ونشارك معه ، ترى اهم شي عنده المشاااااركه حتى لو منتي واثقه من جوابك يقددددددر اللي تشارك بالحيل

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة M.A.S

بنات ممكن تساعدوني بليز؟
عندي اختبار نقد معتذرات ..
اللي عندها شي جاهز من مذاكرتها عن النقاد والنقاد اللي عارضوهم
تعطيني اياه ؟
ما لقيت شي انحاس مخي

عندي أوراقي اللي درست منهم النقد ، أجيبهم لك ؟