عرض مشاركة واحدة
  #1  
قديم 2008- 2- 10
T.J
:: مــشرفـة سـابـقـة ::
بيانات الموضوع:
المشاهدات: 1295
المشاركـات: 8
 
الملف الشخصي:
رقم العضوية : 2981
تاريخ التسجيل: Sun Dec 2007
المشاركات: 191
الـجنــس : أنـثـى
عدد الـنقـاط : 114
مؤشر المستوى: 73
T.J will become famous soon enoughT.J will become famous soon enough
 الأوسمة و جوائز  بيانات الاتصال بالعضو  اخر مواضيع العضو
T.J غير متواجد حالياً
امريكا لم تذهب الى القمر قط!!

!!!!!Apollo Moon Landing was just hoax
SECTION ONE - THE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE - The shadows don't fall right in images taken on the Lunar surface, proving that there are are multiple light sources, like professional stage lighting using high-powered lamps. Since the Moon has only one light source, the Sun, these images (these people claim) "have to have been shot on a sound stage somewhere."




SECTION TWO - THE MECHANICAL ARGUMENTS
- The astronauts could not have egressed and ingressed the LM because they could not fit through the hatch and there was no room to even open the hatch in the LM.

It's hard to know just how to respond to this one beyond simply stating that it is wrong. As you can see from the artist's concept below, the astronauts were positioned on either side of the central cockpit panel, with the main EVA door between them. There was in fact plenty of room to open the hatch. On Apollo 11, Armstrong would have been manning the left position in this view and Aldrin the right. The door was latched to Aldrin's side, necessitating that the door be swung open inward, and effectively "trapping" Aldrin momentarily on his side of the LM. In fact, this is the main reason that Armstrong egressed first. Once he was out, Aldrin was able to close the hatch, move over to Armstrong's position, and exit himself.



The footprints left by the astronauts are proof that the Moon landings are fake.This one is also essentially a two pronged argument. First, the Fox show charged that the LM engine was so powerful that the upper layer of dust should have been blown away around the LM, so there should not be any footprints. Others have charged that the footprints should not be there since in the absence of water as a bonding agent, they should not maintain coherent shapes and sharp outlines.



this is only a summary I made but there's much more to read, intersting huh?
رد مع اقتباس