الموضوع: اللغة الانجليزية l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
عرض مشاركة واحدة
قديم 2012- 1- 6   #5212
so what
أكـاديـمـي فـضـي
 
الصورة الرمزية so what
الملف الشخصي:
رقم العضوية : 15783
تاريخ التسجيل: Tue Nov 2008
المشاركات: 362
الـجنــس : أنـثـى
عدد الـنقـاط : 143
مؤشر المستوى: 73
so what will become famous soon enoughso what will become famous soon enough
بيانات الطالب:
الكلية: جامعة الدمآآم
الدراسة: انتظام
التخصص: English literature
المستوى: المستوى الثامن
 الأوسمة و جوائز  بيانات الاتصال بالعضو  اخر مواضيع العضو
so what غير متواجد حالياً
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|

اقتباس:
المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة d r e a m e r


بنااااات سؤالين عالسريع واللي بتجاوبني لها دعوه عالسريع السريع
الحين اليوت ينتمي لاي مدرسه ؟؟؟ الهيستوريكال كريتيسيزم ؟؟

والسؤال الثاني ... شسالفة ال dynamic of nature الي عند اليوت ؟؟

تقصتني عليها في الميد لاني ما كتبتها الله يوفق الي تشرحها لي

111) Dynamic Nature of Tradition .:

According to Eliot, tradition does not mean the mere copy of the writing of the generations of authors in the past. Tradition cannot be inherited but obtained by hard work. It can be obtained by those who have the historical sense. The person who has the historical sense feels that the whole literature of Europe from the ancient time of Rame to his own century forms one continuous literary tradition. He is conscious of his relation with these writers of the past. Eliot's conception of Tradition is dynamic and not static . This means that it is never fix but changes constantly. The writer (or poet) in the present must seek guidance from the past. The past guides the present i.e. the new work and the present alters and modifies the past i.e. tradition. For example, great poets like Virgil, Dante and Shakespeare have added something to the literary tradition. The addition guided future generation of poets in writing poetry.




Function of Tradition : Importance of Both Tradition and Individual Talent According to Eliot, tradition has typical function. The works of the past are judged by the new works of art. The purpose is not seen whether the new works are better or worse than the works of the past. The comparison is reciprocal. The past (tradition) helps to understand the present and the present (individual talent) throws light on the past. Thus, the comparison reveals the importance of both, tradition and the individual talent. Both are 'valid' and 'valuable' in their own ways. However, it is their combination ('blend') which can crate a good work of art. In fact, 'tradition' and the 'individual talent' go or should go hand in hand.


Sense of the Tradition and its Importance :

Eliot also speaks about the sense of tradition. It does not mean that the poet in the present should try to know the past as a whole. Actually, only the significant from it should be acquired. The poet should not know only the authors whom he admires. On the contrary, he should know all small and great poets of all the Ages. Similarly, in order to know the tradition, the poet must judge critically what the main trends are and what are not.
Conclusion : Thus, Eliot has given his views on the nature of the tradition of teh past authors and its relationship with an individual poet. Eliot concluded that it is the sense of tradition which is more important than the personality of an individual artist.


كلامهم مرا سهل ومفهوووم ..
بالميد تيرم كنت معتمدة لأليوت اغلب شي من عرض البوربوينت اللي ارفقته وهو نفسه اللي نسخت لك منه
مقسسسسم البوربوينت ع تقسيم التكست ويفتح النفسسسس
الملفات المرفقة
نوع الملف: ppt Tradition and Individual Talent.ppt‏ (161.5 كيلوبايت, المشاهدات 1545) تحميل الملفإضافة الملف لمفضلتكعرض الملف