2012- 1- 7
|
#5437
|
|
أكـاديـمـي نــشـط
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
اسفه نسخت بالغلط 
شوفو هذا اخذته من طالبات جامعه .gif)
Distinctions between realism and naturalism
Let' s consider the differences between the work of the realists (e.g Ibsen) and those of the naturalists (e.g Chekhov and Zola). We can do this best by considering two speeches from associated plays. (reference: 'Acting in Person and in Style', 1980)
For eight years I've been waiting patiently; I knew, of course, that such things don't happen every day. Then, when this trouble came to me - I thought to myself; Now! Now the wonderful thing will happen! All the time Krogstad's letter was out there in the box, it never occurred to me for a single moment that you'd think of submitting to his conditions. I was absolutely convinced that you'd defy him - that you'd tell him to publish the thing to all the world; and that thenة
(Nora to Torvald. 'A Doll's House' by Henrik Ibsen)
Not only in two or three hundred years but in a million years of life will be just the same; it does not change, it remains stationary, following its own laws which we have nothing to do with or which, anyway fly backwards and forwards and whatever ideas, great or small, stray through their minds, they will go on flying just the same without knowing where or why. They fly and will continue to fly, however philosophic they may become; and it doesn't matter how philosophical they are so long as they go on flyingة
(Tusenbach 'The Three Sisters' by Anton Chekhov)
Nora's speech (realism)
In Nora's speech, the flow of words is orderly and selective, logical in intent
The lines are believeable and truthful although a little heightened
The character is inwardly motivated - this is a realistic speech
دعواتكم ياغوالي لان حاملتها العام مع شهال ابليس
|
|
|
|
|
|