ملتقى طلاب وطالبات جامعة الملك فيصل,جامعة الدمام - عرض مشاركة واحدة - :: هــــنـا مــنــاقــــــشـــة مــادة عــــــلم المـــــعــاني والبراغــمـــاتيك ::

البريئة2 · 2012- 5- 17

شكرا

اقتباس:

المشاركة الأصلية كتبت بواسطة البريئة2

من يشرح لي المثال اللي عن lexical ambiguity في المحاضرة الرابعة
وهل صحيح ان الغموض النحوي يحدث للسامع بينما الغموض المعجمي يحدث للقارئ ؟

اشرحو لي هذا المثال
vicious
In modern British usage, it is commonly used to mean ‘fierce 'as in the brown rat is a vicious animal
vicious في الانجليزية الحديثة كانت تعني (‘fierce ) اللي هو الجرذ البني الذي يعتبر حيوان عنيف

مافهمته عدل !
انا ترجمت كلمة (‘fierce يعني عنيف ما يعني جرذ مثلا!

ابي احد يشرح لي هذا
It has a heuristic(guiding) value, not any absolute or definitional status; but that heuristic value is very great, because, as the fate of a word like 'discourse' shows, such structures of meaning, once they have been laid down, can be surprisingly stable - more so than is the case with phonological structures. But this kind of history interacts with another kind: the history of various appropriations of the complex, the agents, contexts and purposes which
can leave their traces in what we call the 'meaning' of the word

The historical semantics of this kind does not have a one-dimensional view of meaning (a word as a signifier bound to one signified that is its true meaning) nor even a two-dimensional view, which concerns a 'field' of meanings. A 'keyword' must be seen as a kind of syntagm, a sequence of linguistic units in a syntagmatic relationship to one another’ with a massively deleted surface form which is the site of extensive transformational processes which are used by the set of features that specify it.