ملتقى طلاب وطالبات جامعة الملك فيصل,جامعة الدمام - عرض مشاركة واحدة - اللغة الانجليزية last year......old plan group

شتاء عمري · 2012- 12- 26

هذا الشي موجود بتفريغ العام ليفز ومنه فيه كلام رنومه

though Leavis ' view and literary criticism is based on the destruction of what he called the organic community by the advent of the machine and mass culture. Based on tradition, cut work and close personal relationship, the organic community is harmonious whereas industrial society based on rules , machines and unanimity is dissonant. Leavis' comments on culture belong to tradition dating back to at least the late 18th century whose thinkers were alarmed by the growing separation of the economy and the society. His argument was that a growth of the press underlines a common culture by creating different markets for different tastes. The constant reinforcement of these tastes variable made it difficult for any one group to find a common ground with any other group. Consequently, there is no agreement about what constituted standards. In this situation, the artist had a little choice but to write for a particular market rather than an educated public.
Enactment is the first word one must take count of an estimate of his views. It is the notion that works of art act their moral judgment. It is brought out in an attempt to assess the limitations of Jonson Augustans' mind and sensibility was confronted with Shakespeare's characteristics use of language. Works of art enact their moral evaluation. They do so generally not by deploying words to reinforce a didactic intention but by a specifically poetic use of language which Leavis characterizes as the poetic creator.
Leavis is insisting on a conception of literature which has relevance and value for other things beside literature. a vitalizing recourse of concrete concern living as well as reading for writing. Leavis goes on to talk not about intentions and the correct way of bringing them into art but bout language and about the kind of inner life which it must maintain a contact if it is to be at all capable of registering the source of valuation which literature exists to register. This concern of life is a concern for a moral poetic vitality which can have varying manifestation.

دعووواتكم

2012- 12- 26	#1340
شتاء عمري أكـاديـمـي ألـمـاسـي الملف الشخصي: رقم العضوية : 45978 تاريخ التسجيل: Tue Jan 2010 المشاركات: 1,283 الـجنــس : أنـثـى عدد الـنقـاط : 148 مؤشر المستوى: 78 بيانات الطالب: الكلية: كليه الاداب بالدمام الدراسة: انتظام التخصص: English المستوى: المستوى السابع	رد: last year......old plan group هذا الشي موجود بتفريغ العام ليفز ومنه فيه كلام رنومه though Leavis ' view and literary criticism is based on the destruction of what he called the organic community by the advent of the machine and mass culture. Based on tradition, cut work and close personal relationship, the organic community is harmonious whereas industrial society based on rules , machines and unanimity is dissonant. Leavis' comments on culture belong to tradition dating back to at least the late 18th century whose thinkers were alarmed by the growing separation of the economy and the society. His argument was that a growth of the press underlines a common culture by creating different markets for different tastes. The constant reinforcement of these tastes variable made it difficult for any one group to find a common ground with any other group. Consequently, there is no agreement about what constituted standards. In this situation, the artist had a little choice but to write for a particular market rather than an educated public. Enactment is the first word one must take count of an estimate of his views. It is the notion that works of art act their moral judgment. It is brought out in an attempt to assess the limitations of Jonson Augustans' mind and sensibility was confronted with Shakespeare's characteristics use of language. Works of art enact their moral evaluation. They do so generally not by deploying words to reinforce a didactic intention but by a specifically poetic use of language which Leavis characterizes as the poetic creator. Leavis is insisting on a conception of literature which has relevance and value for other things beside literature. a vitalizing recourse of concrete concern living as well as reading for writing. Leavis goes on to talk not about intentions and the correct way of bringing them into art but bout language and about the kind of inner life which it must maintain a contact if it is to be at all capable of registering the source of valuation which literature exists to register. This concern of life is a concern for a moral poetic vitality which can have varying manifestation. دعووواتكم