 |
|
||||||
| منتدى كلية الآداب بالدمام منتدى كلية الآداب بالدمام ; مساحة للتعاون و تبادل الخبرات بين طالبات كلية الآداب بالدمام و نقل آخر الأخبار و المستجدات . |
 |
|
|
أدوات الموضوع |
2012- 1- 5
|
#5181 |
|
أكـاديـمـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
مساء النور
الله يوفقنا يارب لاتنسون يابنات إن ربي يعطي كل شخص على قد جهده وعمله يعني اكرفوا نفسكم هالاسبوع عشان تتخرجون هالسنه .gif "(204)") سؤال مهم<<<<<<<<<<<<<< كيف راح تكون الأسئلة  بليييييز اللي يعرف يقول لي |
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5182 |
|
أكـاديـمـي ألـمـاسـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
بنات لا تقعدون شايلين هم الملزمه حقت دريدي.. كذا ماراح تركزون ابد .. !!!
ذاكرو الجزئيه اللي ماذاكرتوها ابد .. وبعدين اطبعوا اوراق دريدي. ترا ..صورتها رحلة عمر ونزلتها هون .. واذا الطابعه خربانه او مافيه طابعه .. عادي ذاكريها من اللاب او المكتبي او الجوال او الاي باد ((ميته ابيه ..الله يلعن المكافات مابعد جت  ))او اللي هو ..  واذا استعصي الامر مره وحده .. الله يفرج عليكم .. ارجعو ذاكرو التفريغ .. وسلامتكم .. 
|
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5183 |
|
أكـاديـمـي ألـمـاسـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
من تقدر تكتب النقاط اللي ناقشتها دريدي بالملزمتين
عشان نعرف وش اللي ناقصنا .. |
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5184 |
|
أكـاديـمـي ألـمـاسـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
هذا فهمي لسالفة السينسرتي والإنسينسيرتي والاموشنال وانتلكتشوال بيليفس اقرأوه وصححوني اذا غلط واذا صح قولولي عشان احس اني شاطره
If we misunderstand something it is because we are being insincere to ourselves, we base our understanding on an assumption so we cannot give a justification of why we believe or disbelieve something. Assumption is based on two beliefs ;The intellectual belief and the emotional belief. If a person has certain ideas and he finds an idea in a poem that appeals to him, he applies all his ideas to that work. And if the poem appeals to his emotion, then he assumes different meanings and starts to apply his own meaning to the poem. We should blend these two beliefs; the intellectual and emotional to understand the work correctly otherwise we will be just assuming things that we cannot justify and therefore we would be insincere to ourselves. |
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5185 | |
|
أكـاديـمـي نــشـط
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
اقتباس:
هذا مو كأنه ريتشاردز ..؟؟؟؟؟؟ |
|
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5186 | |
|
أكـاديـمـي ألـمـاسـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
اقتباس:
هذه المحاضرات ~
|
|
|
|
||
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5187 |
|
أكـاديـمـي نــشـط
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
يسعد مسآكم وموفقين في النقد يارب
قريت اوراق عن ليفز وقلت انسخه لكم يمكن تستفيدون لاني تقريبا فهمت ليفز F.R. Leavis Frank Raymond Leavis died in 1978 which means after the middle of the 20th century. He had a very prominent influence upon criticism though there were especially in his time lots of opponents and criticism towards his essays and articles he was writing. He was a lecturer and a professor in Cambridge university. Because he was a teacher, this actually affected his own way of writing and from his books Valuation in Criticism and Other Essays, Great Tradition, New Bearings in English Poetry and Common Pursuit. All of his works has this educational flavor, a pursuit or effort. He was also an editor for other literary journals but his ideas and thoughts have extended to be an influence on literary criticism until the present time, because his main critical ideas were based on humanitarian bases. He believed in the importance of relating literature to be a kind of a model, a kind of writings that would elevate and educate people. So, he had this humanistic approach in his criticism. He mainly was influenced by Mathew Arnold and T.S Eliot. As literature was a substitute of religion in a way that it elevates the life of people, Mathew Arnold was basically interested in tradition, in the past, in old writings and poetry that belongs to different ages. Mainly he was interested in literature as a source of light for people to make a kind of spiritual relief in an age that was full of changes. Being influenced by Eliot, means that he is interested in tradition and objectivity towards regarding tradition and its position in the life of people. It is always an attempt to cultivate people. What happened was that in the time of F.R. Leavis that extended throughout the first half of 20th century which have witnessed industrial development. In the 18th and 19th century there was a kind of scientific development which actually in the 20th century has developed to a kind of industrial development. This industrial development has imposed a certain style of life, ideas and concepts towards the way we live, communicate with each other and the way we progress in life. So when people are dominated with this industrial development, values change and there is material benefit becomes the most important, people are evaluated according to their productivity or the value of their work. The value is connected to material elements which mean the value one gets as a person or object depends on his productivity. People started to gain materialistic values and people have been evaluated the same way as objects like material things not as human beings. The style of life itself have changed according to the building of factories and having workers. The way of work became different in factories. The owner needs to control that factory in order to get more money which means hard work and time control as loss of time means loss of money. There should be control of time, people and machines. Life is controlled and there is scientific management. That was the essence of changes in the early part of 20th century which led of course that certain writers and thinkers who would try to give more details and principals so that people would get more benefit of their industry and the new style of life that have started in the 20th century. At the same time, Leavis and others have felt this kind of change in their life that have witnessed a separation from old values of the life of people. That thing that happened with news papers, magazines and press was a kind of separation. This kind of separation made people classified into separated groups that each group would target a certain type of writing. Before that time, writings were complete kinds of writing which all people would read there was no specialties which would isolate people into different groups and interests. Then the isolation result in disconnection with people among the same society and community. Now people neglect tradition and the focus now is only to gin more profit, develop the style of living in this modern life which for Leavis ,who was very sensitive and conscious, knew that this style of like would make a kind of separation and lead to serious problems in society. The key for this problem was instead of depending on the modern or contemporary civilization, we have to have a kind of evaluative reading of works that we are interested in. it means to see the value of the things we need. The value he means is the cultural and spiritual value that we really need to search for in the woks we are reading. According to this, we can give value to the works they are reading whether they are good or not. The method that Leavis has adopted in his criticism had been influenced by this scientific management. The same thing with control that the manager does in factory, Leavis has adopted the same technique in literature that it should be put under control in order to have a value in our life. ‘Enactment’ is a very crucial word that Leavis used. This words means how a work of art would act or produce its morals. There is am effort here as it shows how the text would act its morality towards its readers. What he is targeting is a community of readers who are educated people, interested in literature especially the English one, critics and students of literature. Only those people would be able to make an evaluative reading to literature and to see how works of art enact (to see the value of the work). The most important thing is although he is interested in the morality and value of the work of art, he is an objective writer. That means that when he is discussing the morality of the work, he is separating it from the writer. So he believes that what we search in a work of art should not extent to the life of the writer. The moral values that we search in a work of art are separated from the personal life of the writer and the history of the work itself. He is an objective writer, belongs to modern criticism but in the same time he focuses on that a work of art should have moral ideas and not searching only for the form of the work. The content is very important but it should not meet with the real life of the writer. The content should only meet with the form of the work. His basic idea is to have moral value to make the reader feel self recognition. Leavis did something better that what Arnold had done and that was that he made a kind of thorough survey of literature throughout history which is a study of writers and their works to search for evaluative standards of their work to show the enactment of their works and how these works hold within itself moralities that is working in separation of the writer. The writers he thinks they deserve to belong to the literary tradition. He believes that Shakespeare was one of the great writers who were able to produce a literature that can be described as composing in itself a kind of moral value. He believes that the people, in his time, helped Shakespeare to write such kind of works because of the language they speak, the consciousness they have led Shakespeare to make a work of enactment. Leavis praises Metaphysical writers and also Keats who was one of great writers of the romantic period. For him Keats, to be compared with Shelly, is much greater writer. He did not like the works of Shelly. Keats was writing about beauty. The difference between them is that Shelly is too personal in his work which means that the morality that he discusses in his work is personal and there is no balance between the morality or the ideas and the emotions in his work. There are exaggerated emotions in his work. However, Keats was much better, because he was able to produce a kind of morality and emotions that is actually separated from him as a person. While Shelly, was always attaching emotions and moralities of himself to his work. He liked novelists like Jane Austen, George Eliot, Henry James, but not Dickens, Bronte’s not even James Joyce, as he felt that their works were kind of entertainment and not true art. D.H. Lawrence was a novelist and a poet of the 20th century and he believes that the morality of the works of Lawrence is the one that actually represents life but not Lawrence himself though Lawrence was expressing real life. These are Leavis ideas. They are about Enactment, evaluative method or technique and the impersonality. His impersonality that was in one way or the other is similar to what T.S Eliot was discussing in “Tradition and The Individual Talent” that only writers with personality would be very flexible to change themselves to different shapes will be able to produce works that are detached from themselves. Enactment is the notion that works of art act their moral judgments. Works of art enact their moral evaluations not by deploying works to enforce a didactic intention but by a specifically poetic use of language which leavis characterizes as the poetic creator. Leavis is insisting on a conception of literature which has relevance and a value for other things beside literature. The word ‘enactment’ implies that good poetry embodies, enacts evaluation of a reality at what is inner (spiritual) and outer (social or sensuous). To enact a valuation is to realize whatever is evaluated. It is to bring us into an immediate and living relation with reality. The purpose of evaluating literature is to keep alive the tradition of the human world not by admiring its achievements but by bringing its values, purpose and significance to bear on the present. بالتوفيق للجميع
|
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5188 | |
|
أكـاديـمـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
اقتباس:
اللي ذاكرته: كيف انقسم نقده 4 اقسام كيف نقده في الشعر كيف نقده في النوفل ماهي وجهت نظره بالادب والحياه عطانا 3 قصائد ل كيت وكيف جاب كتاب ثانين انتقدو هذي الاعمال عشان يبين وجهة نظره هو وبس اذا انا غلطانه ولا ناقصني شي علموني<---------  طيب بنات شنو تتوقعون اسئلة الاسي؟ |
|
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5189 | |
|
أكـاديـمـي ألـمـاسـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
اقتباس:
صح والا لا
|
|
|
2012- 1- 5
|
#5190 |
|
أكـاديـمـي ذهـبـي
|
رد: l|][Ξ¯▪ Last Year 1st Semester ▪¯Ξ][|
نونه اشوف عندكم تقاسيم و ماتقاسيم
.gif "(107)") علمونا معاكم عن ليفز ترا باقي ماتعرفت على الرجل الطيب "الله لا يبرك فقبره"...............مغرزه في اليوت باقي وباقي ريتشاردز وارنولد خلصته وليفز بعد ماتعرفت عليه هلموا الينا وعلمونا مما علمكم الله
|
|
| مواقع النشر (المفضلة) |
| الذين يشاهدون محتوى الموضوع الآن : 1 ( الأعضاء 0 والزوار 1) | |
|
|
.gif "(269)")
